Showing posts with label Richard Prince. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Richard Prince. Show all posts

Thursday, July 30, 2026

Album Covers by Artists



For the second day in a row, the Pitchfork lead album review has featured a record with a classic contemporary artwork on the cover. 

Yesterday it was the Strokes, whose new LP features the famous Richard Prince Untitled (Cowboy) image, and today it was zayALLCAPS’ My Uncle Told Me Some Real Ass Sh*t on the Phone Yesterday. It includes an image of David Hammons pissing on a Richard Serra work. 

Untitled (Cowboy) is one of Prince’s signature works, from a series that began in the mid-1970s, when Prince earned a living clipping magazine articles for staff writers at Time-Life Inc. Only the advertisements remained, and he began rephotographing and enlarging them. 

Alongside Spiritual America (a rephotograph of a young nude Brooke Shields), Untitled (Cowboy) is possibly the most iconic work from the series, featuring a rephotographed Marlboro ad, with the cowboy figure isolated and presented anew, removed from the original commercial context.

The Stokes cover is credited to Johann Rashid, who possibly rephotographed the rephotograph. 

The zayALLCAPS LP (not yet released on vinyl, it would seem) features the 1981 David Hammons work Pissed Off, one of two interventions Hammons made with Serra’s sculptures. A series of images by Dawoud Bey document Hammons urinating on the Serra work T.W.U in 1981, and then receiving a citation from an NYPD officer [see below]. The work is titled Pissed Off












Monday, July 21, 2025

Richard Prince | Untitled (Black Bra)




Richard Prince
Untitled (Black Bra)
Berlin, Germany: Texte Zur Kunst, 2024
31 × 30.8 cm.
Edition of 100 [+20 AP] signed and numbered copies


Released last June in an edition of 100, Prince’s third edition with Texte Zur Kunst (a Ditone print on Hahnemühle Photo Rag) has sold out. 


"Richard Prince began appropriating fragments of contemporary visual culture at the end of the 1970s and, closely linked to the Pictures Generation, he has drawn from diverse contexts and created a multilayered oeuvre held together above all by appropriation as an artistic method. By borrowing imagery from advertising, pop culture, or other artists and making it into an element of his own work, Prince questions the mechanisms and protocols of the socioeconomic systems from which his material originated. 

For his third TEXTE ZUR KUNST edition, Prince has chosen one of his “Black Bra” works, which consists of underwear on canvas – or rather, of canvas wearing lingerie. The motif of the black bra has been a recurring one for Prince recently, including in his latest series of Instagram screenshots, the “New Portraits,” which show lightly clad influencers painting while shirtless, stripped down to their lingerie. Prince’s series highlights the “Rückenfigur” as a particularly popular pose for presenting oneself effectively on social media. Each image of the “New Portraits” is accompanied by comments – a mix of (auto)biographical and art historical notes that form an essential component of the work – posted by Joan Katz (handle joankatzz), with whom Prince supposedly founded a band called Black Bra in 1990. 
“Supposedly” because he subverts principles such as authorship and originality not only by appropriating visuals but also by playing with identities and myths, which are just as fundamental to fame in art and pop culture as iconic images. The motif of the edition “Untitled (Black Bra)” also adorns the cover of Prince’s artist’s book “New Paintings,” dedicated to the “New Portraits” and released by the artist’s Fulton Ryder imprint.”
- publisher’s blurb


Wednesday, January 8, 2025

Richard Prince | Skull Bunny Shopping Bag






Richard Prince
Skull Bunny Shopping Bag
New York City, USA/ Toronto, Canada: Printed Matter / Art Metropole, 1991
43 x 27.9 cm.
Edition size unknown


A screenprinted brown paper shopping bag published in conjunction with the exhibition Learn To Read Art in Basel, Switzerland, in June of 1991. The exhibition was a collaborative effort between Art Metropole and Printed Matter and the title (and the bag's verso text) is by Lawrence Weiner. The bag was printed by Imschoot, Uitgevers.




Saturday, February 3, 2024

Lee Ranaldo

 













`



Happy Birthday to Lee Ranaldo. 










Thursday, November 9, 2023

David Shrigley | Nineteen Eighty-Four








A friend of mine ran a used record store in Toronto where I would visit almost daily, in the late nineties. Behind the counter was a handwritten sign that read: 

Yes, We Have No Doubt1

It was not a message for those looking to purchase the multi-platinum Tragic Kingdom CD, but rather to dissuade anyone hoping to unload it.2 The recording sold sixteen million copies worldwide, but fell quickly out of fashion. 

An Oxfam shop in Swansea posted a similar sign in 2017, discouraging donations of Dan Brown’s blockbuster novel The Da Vinci Code. The manager of the charity shop, Phil Broadhurst, presented a pile of the paperbacks at the front counter, accompanied by a sign that read: 

Yeah you could give us another Da Vinci Code, but we would rather have your vinyl. We urgently need more records to keep our customers happy and to make more money for Oxfam!

An image of the display went viral and caught the eye of David Shrigley. 

"I read the story in the Telegraph and that sparked my imagination in the sense that I was like 'I want those. I don't know why, but I want them’,” he told the BBC last week. “So, I set about acquiring as many Da Vinci Codes as I could.”

He amassed six thousand copies of the 2003 thriller3, before knowing what he would do with them. I visited his home in Glasgow once and there were baskets of onions everywhere, dozens of them, on every floor, lining the staircases, in every corner. I asked if they were for a forthcoming project, and was told that that his partner had grown them on their allotment garden, and they didn’t know how to distribute them. I imagine copies of Dan Brown’s book piled similarly all over the house. 

Shrigley then had the realization that 2020 marked seventy years since author George Orwell’s death, finally releasing his dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four into the public domain.

The artist had re-read Orwell’s classic during the pandemic and marvelled at how it topical it remained, particularly in regards to the way that language is subverted. And the threats to democracy. 

“It’s still a really resonant book,” he told The Art Newspaper, “it seemed even more relevant than when I first read it, when you were invited to see it as a parable of Soviet or Chinese communism”.

He decided to pulp his six thousand copies of The Da Vinci Code and use the resulting paper to print 1,250 copies of Nineteen Eighty-Four, under the publishing name of Pulped Fiction. 

The self-funded project cost “well into six figures”, and featured several setbacks, including the paper mill they used burning down. 

“I’m in a position in my life now where I can actually afford to take risks and do things that I want to do, even though they don't necessarily really fit in my canon of work,” Shrigley says. “The really interesting thing about a work like this is that the conversation informs the work. It’s the conversations that you have which further its progress.”

At first glance the work would appear to share something in common with Richard Prince’s reprint of J.D.Salinger’s The Catcher in the Rye, or Sherrie Levine’s Un Coeur Simple, by Gustave Flaubert. But those titles are both about authorship. Shrigley isn’t inserting himself into the title as author, but rather as publisher. His upcycling of one title whose supply exceeds its demand into another that doesn’t, shares more in common with Katie Paterson’s brilliant Future Library5

Shrigley's books were made available last week at the Swansea charity shop that inspired the project. They were priced at £495 for the first 250 customers, with the remaining thousand to be sold for £795 on the artist’s website.

"Four hundred and ninety five pounds seems like a kind of crazy price,” he admits, "However I have made an artwork, a signed print to go in it, which is based on a lot of the themes of Nineteen Eighty-Four. So people are perhaps willing to pay that price for an original artwork of mine, where they might not be for the book, so I've sort of hedged my bets."

A 30-minute documentary about the project is forthcoming. 









1. The phrasing recalls Yes! We Have No Bananas, a novelty song that spent five weeks at the top of the charts in 1923. 

2. Sean McCarthy of PopMatters spent seven years trying to sell a copy of R.E.M.’s Monster to used record stores. Read his account here.

3. The Da Vinci Code sold 80 million copies worldwide and was the second best selling book the year it was released, outsold only by Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix. Ron Howards 2006 cinematic adaptation earned over three-quarters of a billion dollars at the box office. 

4. Nineteen Eighty-Four entered the public domain on the 1st of January 2021, in most parts of the world. It remains protected by copyright laws in the United States until 2044. 

5. Paterson planted a forest in Norway in 2014. In a hundred years time the thousand trees will be cut down and used to print stories that are being written now. The first author commissioned was Margaret Atwood, whose The Handmaid’s Tale was also partial inspiration for David Shrigley. He was struck by a comment Atwood made while promoting the 2017 television adaptation - that there wasn’t anything that happened in the book that hadn’t happened somewhere in the world. "From the removal of women’s rights to the removal of civil rights from the general population. These weren’t invented phenomena. They were things that were actually happening at the time,” Shrigley noted. 



Thursday, May 18, 2023

Two Princes





Rulings in two copyright cases this week - both involving visual artists using images of musicians - are sure to have significant implications for artists working with appropriated material. 

The first involved US District Judge Sidney Stein refusing to dismiss two lawsuits against Richard Prince. Photographer Eric McNatt sued Richard Prince in 2016 over his use of a portrait of Sonic Youth’s Kim Gordon, originally commissioned by Paper magazine in 2014. Prince attempted the fair-use defence, which Stein rejected, noting that “the primary image in both works is the photograph itself” and asserting that “Prince has not materially altered the composition, presentation, scale, colour palette, and media.”

The case involving Andy Warhol is both simpler and more complicated. Warhol's work can more easily be viewed as 'transforming' the original, but the primary issue here involves intent. Both the original photograph (taken by Lynn Goldsmith) and Warhol's silkscreen were made to illustrate articles about the musician Prince. Warhol was commissioned by Vanity Fair and Goldsmith was paid $400 to license her original photograph. When Prince died in 2016, Vanity Fair ran a different image from the series in a commemorative issue, paying the Warhol estate ten grand, and Goldsmith nothing. 

Today the US Supreme Court today ruled 7-2 against the Warhol Foundation, overturning a New York federal district judge, who had ruled in favor of Warhol on the grounds that the work was sufficiently transformative and thus fell within the realm of “fair use.” 

Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor, writing for the majority, noted that “Lynn Goldsmith’s original works, like those of other photographers, are entitled to copyright protection, even against famous artists.”

Both artists are significant to the copyright debate. In helping to shape the Pop Art movement, Warhol's use of existing imagery (Campbell's Soup Cans, Brillo Boxes, Mao, Marilyn Monroe, etc.) became some of the most iconic appropriations in the art world. Richard Prince's Untitled (Cowboy), a rephotographing of a cigarette advertisement, was the first rephotograph to be sold for more than a million dollars.

In December 2008, photographer Patrick Cariou filed suit against Prince for copyright infringement, in regards to a series of images of Rastafarians that Cariou had taken in Jamaica. In 2011, US District Judge Deborah A. Batts ruled against Prince, finding that the use by Prince was not fair use (his primary defence), and Cariou's issue of liability for copyright infringement was granted in its entirety.

Prince appealed and both the Warhol Foundation and the Robert Rauschenberg Foundation filed briefs in the case, siding with the artist and arguing that the intellectual content and aesthetic meaning of works of art are not always visible to the naked eye without art-historical context. The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed Judge Batts's ruling, citing a 1992 Jeff Koons ruling (illustrating the importance of precedence in these cases). He stated that Prince's use of the photographs were transformative and thus fair use. 

Subsequently, much of Prince's work has almost seemed pointedly provocative from the standpoint of copyright. These include an entire exhibition of other people's Instagram posts and reprinting JD Salinger's classic 1951 novel, The Catcher in the Rye in its entirety (see earlier post, here). 

If today's Warhol ruling opens the floodgates of lawsuits, the Warhol Foundation's ability to provide grants to artists and institutions might be seriously hampered. 






Friday, August 6, 2021

Richard Prince









Richard Prince turns 72 today. 

Tuesday, May 25, 2021

Top Stories Exhibition







Top Stories was a prose periodical featuring experimental writing by women authors and artists. The series included staple-bound booklets by Jenny Holzer, Kathy Acker, Laurie Anderson, Pati Hill, Mary Kelly, Cookie Mueller, and others. The series also included visual contributions by artists such as David Armstrong, Joe Gibbons, Nan Goldin, Peter Hujar, Gary Indiana, Richard Prince and Leslie Thornton. 

The series was published by Hallwalls Contemporary Arts Center in Buffalo, New York, an artist-run centre founded by Charles Clough, Robert Longo, Diane Bertolo, Nancy Dwyer, Larry Lundy, Cindy Sherman and Michael Zwack in 1974. 

The 29 publications produced between 1978 and 1991 are now the subject of the an exhibition at The Netherlands Kunstverein. Complete sets of the series are somewhat rare, but not too prohibitively expensive that they needed to be displayed as rare objects under glass. This allows the museum to avoid the typical trappings of archival shows, and instead display the works on a magazine rack. The press release invites visitors to "browse, smell, read and touch the material for yourself."

In addition to the publications, the show features a newly commissioned two-channel film by Peggy Ahwesh, unpacking the Top Stories archives. Parallel to the exhibition, is the publication of Tense,  a never-realized publication by Lucy Lippard and Jerry Kearns from 1984. It will be launched during Amsterdam Art Weekend, towards the end of the exhibition.


"As I listen to Turyn speaking to Ahwesh about Top Stories #9: Kathy Acker (1981), I pick up the issue in question and flip through it. In the film, Turyn describes how she took care of the imagery for this issue herself, after Acker wrote her a letter saying that she wanted ‘the photographs to undermine the text’. In response, Turyn walked through Manhattan, from 57th Street to Chelsea, with Acker’s text, New York City in 1979, in mind, taking photos that – while showing no direct connection to the text – similarly evoke the unique social landscape of Times Square. The chapbook is bookended by two photographs of a clothed woman sitting on a chair, with only her lower half visible. On the first page, her legs are closed and, in the last, they are wide open. Turyn initially thought the chapbook should finish with the image of the woman’s legs closed to signify the end of the book, but Acker wanted it the other way around, arguing: ‘Literature should be open-ended.’ It’s something that could also be said of this exhibition, which, through its pared back yet insightful presentation, shows the importance of letting writers speak for themselves, offering an experience that is as open-ended as Acker intended her work to be."

- Julia Mullié, Frieze

Monday, February 8, 2021

Just Another Asshole #6







[Barbara Ess, Glenn Branca]
Just Another Asshole #6
New York City, USA: Primary Information, 2018
192 pp., 7 x 4”, softcover
Edition of 2000


My very first curatorial projects were exhibitions of artists’ magazines and artists’ records. Just Another Asshole was included in both.  

The periodical was a No Wave mixed-media publication started by Barbara Ess in her apartment in the Lower East Side of Manhattan, in 1978. It began life as a personal ‘zine of her collages, with the title scrawled in red nail polish on the cover. The third issue changed the format (to a tabloid newspaper) and each subsequent issue the format changed again. Number four was a four page spread in the 1980 issue of Artforum. Number five was a 12” LP: an anthology of seventy-seven very short tracks, by eighty-three artists. Co-published with White Columns, the album was co-edited by Glenn Branca and featured contributions from Jenny Holzer, Carla Liss,  Dan Graham, Barbara Kruger, Lee Ranaldo, Dara Birnbaum, Eric Bogosian, Thurston Moore, Amy Taubin and others. 

The sixth (and penultimate) issue was a paperback book. Again co-edited by Glenn Branca, this collection of writings included over sixty artists from the early 1980's downtown scene. It includes short stories, performance transcripts, plays, monologues, screenplays, and essays. 

Contributors include Kathy Acker,  Judith Barry, Buczak, Michael Gira (singer for the Swans), Jack Goldstein, Dan Graham, Jenny Holzer, Barbara Kruger, Cookie Mueller, Peter Nadin, Richard Prince, Lee Ranaldo (Sonic Youth), David Rosenbloom, Jane Sherry (who co-edited a previous issue of the publication), Kiki Smith, Michael Smith, Wharton Tiers, Lynne Tillman, Martha Wilson, David Wojnarowicz, and many others. 

Re-issued by Primary Information in November of 2018, the title is already out-of-print.